Northeast insurgency · indicator 209
Northeast civilian deaths
Modi aheadNo comparable cross-country series exists for this measure, so no synthetic counterfactual can be estimated. The verdict here compares observed Indian figures over time — a weaker basis than the estimated indicators.
2014
2476
baseline
2024
605
latest observed
Change
-76%
2014 vs latest observed
What this measures
Northeast civilian deaths, in deaths. A falling number is an improvement. Reported by South Asia Terrorism Portal (annual) · MHA/PIB (decade summary).
It stood at 2476 in 2014, and under Modi’s current India reached 605 by 2024 — a fall of 76%. That is an improvement against India’s pre-2014 figure.
No comparison country reports an equivalent series, so there is no Rahul's India to compare against. This is a before-and-after reading, not a treatment effect.
Year by year
deaths · annual series, 2000–2024. Bars from 2014 in orange. No counterfactual is estimated — no comparator country reports an equivalent series.
Decade totals
deaths · South Asia Terrorism Portal (annual) · MHA/PIB (decade summary)
Why no counterfactual
Decade totals for India only, from Ministry of Home Affairs reporting. No comparator country publishes an equivalent series, and there is no annual breakdown, so no counterfactual can be estimated.
Observation quality
- 2010
- 2476
- 2014
- 2476
- 2024
- 605
- 2026
- 605
Nearest published observation used · 2004-2014 total
Nearest published observation used · 2004-2014 total
Nearest published observation used · 2014-2024 total
Requested year not yet published; latest observation repeated · 2014-2024 total
Absolute totals recovered from SATP year-wise fatality data, which the original summary left blank. SATP gives -76% against the Home Ministry's reported -89%. These diverge by more than 12 points — the two sources count the theatre's boundaries differently, so treat the direction as solid and the magnitude as contested.
The counterfactual is 'India without the 2014 structural break', estimated from comparator countries. It is not a forecast of any individual's policies.